<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Five Things Fern Reiss Gets Incorrect About POD Subsidy Publishing</title>
	<atom:link href="http://publishing.booklocker.com/2007/01/22/five-things-fern-reiss-gets-incorrect-about-pod-subsidy-publishing/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://publishing.booklocker.com/2007/01/22/five-things-fern-reiss-gets-incorrect-about-pod-subsidy-publishing/</link>
	<description>What goes on the POD and Ebook publishing industry, written by someone who owns a POD and Ebook publishing company.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 13:34:53 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Heather Paye</title>
		<link>http://publishing.booklocker.com/2007/01/22/five-things-fern-reiss-gets-incorrect-about-pod-subsidy-publishing/comment-page-1/#comment-22422</link>
		<dc:creator>Heather Paye</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Mar 2009 04:32:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://publishing.booklocker.com/2007/01/22/five-things-fern-reiss-gets-incorrect-about-pod-subsidy-publishing/#comment-22422</guid>
		<description>Good points were made here. I just self published a POD book myself, and I can honestly say, it&#039;s not that hard to get books into bookstores (as I have done), it&#039;s not that hard to market books, you just have to do it the right way. There is a difference between traditional publishers and self-publishers (POD, whatever you prefer to call them), traditional publishers do some stuff for the author (like handling printing and other gunk), self-publishers... that&#039;s just it, you self-publish, you handle the printing, the marketing, right down to actually creating to book. That is the difference between Traditional and Self-publishers. It&#039;s all about what you, the author knows. 

I, myself, have never been published before, and way before I even attempted to send my book to a publisher of any sort, I did five years of research of what to do, what I should know, what happens, and what should be done, everything else inbetween too! And, so far, I haven&#039;t run into any problems with bookstores, marketing, anything, it&#039;s all smooth sailing, and it&#039;s all what I expected. 

If a teen can do research and publish and market and promote, anyone can, ANYONE! You just gotta know what you&#039;re doing and even after you know what you&#039;re doing you gotta know more!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good points were made here. I just self published a POD book myself, and I can honestly say, it&#8217;s not that hard to get books into bookstores (as I have done), it&#8217;s not that hard to market books, you just have to do it the right way. There is a difference between traditional publishers and self-publishers (POD, whatever you prefer to call them), traditional publishers do some stuff for the author (like handling printing and other gunk), self-publishers&#8230; that&#8217;s just it, you self-publish, you handle the printing, the marketing, right down to actually creating to book. That is the difference between Traditional and Self-publishers. It&#8217;s all about what you, the author knows. </p>
<p>I, myself, have never been published before, and way before I even attempted to send my book to a publisher of any sort, I did five years of research of what to do, what I should know, what happens, and what should be done, everything else inbetween too! And, so far, I haven&#8217;t run into any problems with bookstores, marketing, anything, it&#8217;s all smooth sailing, and it&#8217;s all what I expected. </p>
<p>If a teen can do research and publish and market and promote, anyone can, ANYONE! You just gotta know what you&#8217;re doing and even after you know what you&#8217;re doing you gotta know more!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kathy Hendershot-Hurd</title>
		<link>http://publishing.booklocker.com/2007/01/22/five-things-fern-reiss-gets-incorrect-about-pod-subsidy-publishing/comment-page-1/#comment-6</link>
		<dc:creator>Kathy Hendershot-Hurd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Jan 2007 19:36:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://publishing.booklocker.com/2007/01/22/five-things-fern-reiss-gets-incorrect-about-pod-subsidy-publishing/#comment-6</guid>
		<description>From what I can see here, Fern neglects the most vital issue in the decision whether &quot;To publish traditionally or self publish.&quot; The actual SALES of your BOOK!

See, what isn&#039;t common knowledge among aspiring authors is the amount of PROMOTION necessary to actually sell the books. The difference between the &quot;sweat equity&quot; required on the author&#039;s part is nearly identical between POD publishing, self publishing and traditional publishing. Many, many aspiring authors think that going with a traditional publisher means that all the ugly &quot;marketing&quot; stuff will be taken care of on their behalf.  Oh, NAY NAY! 

I&#039;ve known many &quot;traditionally&quot; published authors, which is one of the reasons it took me 20 years to finally write my first book (and why I chose to Booklocker as my POD publisher when I finally did take the plunge).

What the traditionally published authors I know ran into was that they had a very short window during which they had to generate &quot;buzz&quot; for their book.  If they didn&#039;t generate enough &quot;buzz&quot; to create sales success, then their title was dropped. In return for their substantial promotional efforts, they were rewarded with a very small % of the sale price of the book.

Booklocker does an OUTSTANDING job of detailing what they will do for an author.  It&#039;s also a great place to test and hone your book marketing skills.  With booklocker, if it takes you 18 months to get up a head of steam with your marketing campaign, then it takes you 18 months.  You don&#039;t have to worry about the &quot;ax&quot; dropping on your book before you&#039;ve mastered the basics of marketing your book.

If you just want to get out and work your ARSE off promoting your book for a very small cut of the profits, the find a traditional publisher.  

If you want a bigger piece of the action, then be prepared to deal with processing orders, dealing with printers and mailing out books, in addition to working your ARSE off promoting your book, then by all means, self publish.  

If however, you want to write a book and then spend your time/energy promoting your book and let someone else take care of the &quot;details,&quot; then POD publishing is the way to go.

Thanks Angela and Richard for providing a safe place for my book to spread it&#039;s wings.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From what I can see here, Fern neglects the most vital issue in the decision whether &#8220;To publish traditionally or self publish.&#8221; The actual SALES of your BOOK!</p>
<p>See, what isn&#8217;t common knowledge among aspiring authors is the amount of PROMOTION necessary to actually sell the books. The difference between the &#8220;sweat equity&#8221; required on the author&#8217;s part is nearly identical between POD publishing, self publishing and traditional publishing. Many, many aspiring authors think that going with a traditional publisher means that all the ugly &#8220;marketing&#8221; stuff will be taken care of on their behalf.  Oh, NAY NAY! </p>
<p>I&#8217;ve known many &#8220;traditionally&#8221; published authors, which is one of the reasons it took me 20 years to finally write my first book (and why I chose to Booklocker as my POD publisher when I finally did take the plunge).</p>
<p>What the traditionally published authors I know ran into was that they had a very short window during which they had to generate &#8220;buzz&#8221; for their book.  If they didn&#8217;t generate enough &#8220;buzz&#8221; to create sales success, then their title was dropped. In return for their substantial promotional efforts, they were rewarded with a very small % of the sale price of the book.</p>
<p>Booklocker does an OUTSTANDING job of detailing what they will do for an author.  It&#8217;s also a great place to test and hone your book marketing skills.  With booklocker, if it takes you 18 months to get up a head of steam with your marketing campaign, then it takes you 18 months.  You don&#8217;t have to worry about the &#8220;ax&#8221; dropping on your book before you&#8217;ve mastered the basics of marketing your book.</p>
<p>If you just want to get out and work your ARSE off promoting your book for a very small cut of the profits, the find a traditional publisher.  </p>
<p>If you want a bigger piece of the action, then be prepared to deal with processing orders, dealing with printers and mailing out books, in addition to working your ARSE off promoting your book, then by all means, self publish.  </p>
<p>If however, you want to write a book and then spend your time/energy promoting your book and let someone else take care of the &#8220;details,&#8221; then POD publishing is the way to go.</p>
<p>Thanks Angela and Richard for providing a safe place for my book to spread it&#8217;s wings.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin Murphy</title>
		<link>http://publishing.booklocker.com/2007/01/22/five-things-fern-reiss-gets-incorrect-about-pod-subsidy-publishing/comment-page-1/#comment-5</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin Murphy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jan 2007 02:35:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://publishing.booklocker.com/2007/01/22/five-things-fern-reiss-gets-incorrect-about-pod-subsidy-publishing/#comment-5</guid>
		<description>I believe (1) that Richard is quite correct in his analysis, and (2) that I&#039;d be a dead pigeon if I were doing POD business elsewhere than through Booklocker.  I believe that it is a minefield out there for authors starting out in the business, and it is good to have someone who is playing fair with authors.   Before I decided on Booklocker, I looked at several others.  Most either scared me, or else seemed inept.

As to appearance of our POD books compared to the &quot;real&quot; books, I love the appearance of my book, inside and out--and I agree that POD can look classier than a lot of the stuff on the Borders/B&amp;N, etc., bookshelves!  &quot;Degrees of Murder&quot; certainly does.

As to sales, that&#039;s my responsibility--and there are many more successful POD authors out there, sales-wise, than I--but I know where the fault lies, in that regard, and it is not with Booklocker.

So, stay with it Angela and Richard.  You do an excellent job in a field where few--in my opinion--do well by their clients.  

Hang in there, Angela--Spring is coming!  (Was it just a few years ago when the Maine newbie said, &quot;Oh, boy!  Real snow! :-)

Regards,

Kevin</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I believe (1) that Richard is quite correct in his analysis, and (2) that I&#8217;d be a dead pigeon if I were doing POD business elsewhere than through Booklocker.  I believe that it is a minefield out there for authors starting out in the business, and it is good to have someone who is playing fair with authors.   Before I decided on Booklocker, I looked at several others.  Most either scared me, or else seemed inept.</p>
<p>As to appearance of our POD books compared to the &#8220;real&#8221; books, I love the appearance of my book, inside and out&#8211;and I agree that POD can look classier than a lot of the stuff on the Borders/B&amp;N, etc., bookshelves!  &#8220;Degrees of Murder&#8221; certainly does.</p>
<p>As to sales, that&#8217;s my responsibility&#8211;and there are many more successful POD authors out there, sales-wise, than I&#8211;but I know where the fault lies, in that regard, and it is not with Booklocker.</p>
<p>So, stay with it Angela and Richard.  You do an excellent job in a field where few&#8211;in my opinion&#8211;do well by their clients.  </p>
<p>Hang in there, Angela&#8211;Spring is coming!  (Was it just a few years ago when the Maine newbie said, &#8220;Oh, boy!  Real snow! <img src='http://publishing.booklocker.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Regards,</p>
<p>Kevin</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Crystalwizard</title>
		<link>http://publishing.booklocker.com/2007/01/22/five-things-fern-reiss-gets-incorrect-about-pod-subsidy-publishing/comment-page-1/#comment-4</link>
		<dc:creator>Crystalwizard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jan 2007 21:19:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://publishing.booklocker.com/2007/01/22/five-things-fern-reiss-gets-incorrect-about-pod-subsidy-publishing/#comment-4</guid>
		<description>Comment about Fern&#039;s comments:

Fern Reiss wrote: “Bookstores don’t carry subsidy books.”

Well perhaps that&#039;s true of big stores like Barnes and Noble. It&#039;s not true of smaller stores. I know of several smaller stores in this area alone that are more than happy to carry subsidy books if the author is local. I&#039;m pretty sure that Eragon is a subsidy book, I know it&#039;s self-published, and it&#039;s in all the book stores.

Fern Reiss wrote: “Your book won’t look great. Almost everyone in the publishing industry can spot a POD subsidy book a mile away…”

Not only is that an incorrect statement, a large part of the books that Barnes and Noble have on their shelves right now look like ******. The cardstock for the covers is thing, art is non-existent, the content is drivel and there are quite a few typos. Marketing&#039;s all the matters any more, not quality.

Fern Reiss wrote: “You’ll pay through the nose.

Let&#039;s see: All the money you invest in your book is a business expense. It&#039;s a commercial venture and you (the author) are the business owner. It all comes off on your taxes, or does if you are smart. Not bad for starting up a business in my opinion, you can&#039;t even get into Tupperware that cheaply.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Comment about Fern&#8217;s comments:</p>
<p>Fern Reiss wrote: “Bookstores don’t carry subsidy books.”</p>
<p>Well perhaps that&#8217;s true of big stores like Barnes and Noble. It&#8217;s not true of smaller stores. I know of several smaller stores in this area alone that are more than happy to carry subsidy books if the author is local. I&#8217;m pretty sure that Eragon is a subsidy book, I know it&#8217;s self-published, and it&#8217;s in all the book stores.</p>
<p>Fern Reiss wrote: “Your book won’t look great. Almost everyone in the publishing industry can spot a POD subsidy book a mile away…”</p>
<p>Not only is that an incorrect statement, a large part of the books that Barnes and Noble have on their shelves right now look like ******. The cardstock for the covers is thing, art is non-existent, the content is drivel and there are quite a few typos. Marketing&#8217;s all the matters any more, not quality.</p>
<p>Fern Reiss wrote: “You’ll pay through the nose.</p>
<p>Let&#8217;s see: All the money you invest in your book is a business expense. It&#8217;s a commercial venture and you (the author) are the business owner. It all comes off on your taxes, or does if you are smart. Not bad for starting up a business in my opinion, you can&#8217;t even get into Tupperware that cheaply.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patricia Fry</title>
		<link>http://publishing.booklocker.com/2007/01/22/five-things-fern-reiss-gets-incorrect-about-pod-subsidy-publishing/comment-page-1/#comment-2</link>
		<dc:creator>Patricia Fry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jan 2007 19:31:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://publishing.booklocker.com/2007/01/22/five-things-fern-reiss-gets-incorrect-about-pod-subsidy-publishing/#comment-2</guid>
		<description>Hi Richard,

Good response. I, too, often warn readers and clients about being too eager to sign with a fee-based POD publishing service. Nearly as often, I ultimately say, &quot;And if you decide to go with a POD, consider Booklocker.&quot; My main concern for hopeful authors is that they don&#039;t do their homework. They don&#039;t really know what they&#039;re buying--they don&#039;t understand the publishing industry to begin with.

I reviewed Mark Levine&#039;s new book, &quot;The Fine Print of Self-Publishing&quot; for SPAWN and was pleased to see Booklocker listed among the &quot;Outstanding Self-Publishing Companies.&quot; I&#039;ve been telling everyone who will listen about this.

Congratulations and keep up the good work. Also, thanks for reminding us that when we write or talk about &quot;PODs&quot; we must distinguish between apples and oranges. You have to admit there are some companies that are not as straight-forward as Booklocker and many countless hopeful authors who aren&#039;t approaching the industry with enough information.

Patricia Fry</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Richard,</p>
<p>Good response. I, too, often warn readers and clients about being too eager to sign with a fee-based POD publishing service. Nearly as often, I ultimately say, &#8220;And if you decide to go with a POD, consider Booklocker.&#8221; My main concern for hopeful authors is that they don&#8217;t do their homework. They don&#8217;t really know what they&#8217;re buying&#8211;they don&#8217;t understand the publishing industry to begin with.</p>
<p>I reviewed Mark Levine&#8217;s new book, &#8220;The Fine Print of Self-Publishing&#8221; for SPAWN and was pleased to see Booklocker listed among the &#8220;Outstanding Self-Publishing Companies.&#8221; I&#8217;ve been telling everyone who will listen about this.</p>
<p>Congratulations and keep up the good work. Also, thanks for reminding us that when we write or talk about &#8220;PODs&#8221; we must distinguish between apples and oranges. You have to admit there are some companies that are not as straight-forward as Booklocker and many countless hopeful authors who aren&#8217;t approaching the industry with enough information.</p>
<p>Patricia Fry</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
